Auto logout in seconds.
Continue LogoutInsurers say recent reform efforts have cut millions of prior authorization requests and sped up decisions, signaling momentum to ease a process long criticized for delaying care. But with experts warning that major transparency gaps and administrative burdens remain, they question whether these changes will truly make a difference for patients and providers.
In 2022, CMS proposed a new rule aiming to improve the prior authorization process, streamlining requests and sharing healthcare data more readily. The rule was later finalized in January 2024, and most provisions of the rule went into effect in 2026.
Under the rule, Medicare Advantage organizations, state Medicaid and CHIP fee-for-service programs, Medicaid managed care plans, and CHIP managed care entities are required to send prior authorization decisions within 72 hours for expedited requests and seven calendar days for standard requests. These insurers are also required to automate their prior authorization processes through an electronic prior authorization process programming interface by Jan. 1, 2027.
Insurers are also required to justify any denials and publish data on their prior authorization decisions. They are also required to publicly report certain prior authorization metrics, including approval and denial rates, on their websites as of March 31, 2026.
Several healthcare organizations, including the American Hospital Association (AHA), American Medical Association (AMA), and the American Academy of Family Physicians, praised the rule, saying it would help remove barriers to care and reduce clinician burnout.
Recently, CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz announced a new coalition called the Electronic Prior Authorization Acceleration initiative to help healthcare organizations prepare for new requirements under the final rule. So far, 30 healthcare organizations, including insurers, health systems, and EHR companies, have joined the coalition.
"Prior authorization won't be fixed by technology alone. It requires the entire healthcare system to work together to solve real-world challenges," Oz said. "CMS continues to bring organizations together to do just that, and these early adopters are choosing to lead. This work will help reduce administrative burden, giving clinicians more time to focus on patients and helping people get care faster."
"Announced reductions in the number of services subject to prior authorization are a positive first step, but physicians and patients must experience a meaningful, real-world decrease in administrative burden and care delays."
Commercial insurers have also been trying to improve prior authorization. Last year, over 50 health insurers signed a pledge to standardize and reform their prior authorization processes by reducing the number of medical services requiring prior authorization, increasing transparency and communication around authorization decisions, and implementing real-time responses to reduce delays. Some health plans involved in the initiative include UnitedHealthcare* (UHC), Aetna CVS Health, Cigna, Elevance, and Kaiser Permanente.
"These measurable commitments – addressing improvements like timeliness, scope, and streamlining – mark a meaningful step forward in our work together to create a better system of health," said Kim Keck, president and CEO of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA). "This is an important foundation to address bigger problems together, at a time when technology and interoperability can deliver real improvements to patient experience."
According to a recent report from AHIP and BCBSA, leading health plans have reduced prior authorizations for a variety of different services by 11% since making the reform pledge last year. This reduction is equal to 6.5 million fewer prior authorization requests for patients. Reductions in prior authorizations for Medicare Advantage were even higher at 15%.
Services that no longer require prior authorization include those with clear clinical guidelines and consistent utilization trends for providers. Insurers have also added more consumer-friendly language in their determinations, and if an authorization is denied, have clearly explained what an appeal or next step could be.
"Health plans have taken important initial steps to support patients and are working toward the shared goal of delivering answers at the point of care whenever possible—a goal that will require both plans and providers to eliminate manual processes and adopt real-time electronic data sharing," said AHIP president and CEO Mike Tuffin.
Some insurers, such as UHC*, are decreasing their prior authorization rates even further. Earlier this month, UHC announced that it plans to eliminate prior authorization requirements for 30% of medical services that previously needed approval. Some of these services include select outpatient surgeries, some diagnostic tests, some outpatient therapies, and some chiropractic care.
"Eliminating these requirements is one more way we are working to make it easier for patients to get the care they need when they need it and ensure doctors can spend more time with their patients," said UHC CEO Tim Noel.
Even with these improvements, experts say there are still limitations with prior authorization, particularly around transparency and what kind of data is available to consumers.
Although CMS' final rule on prior authorization requires certain insurers to publicly report different prior authorization metrics on their websites, it currently does not have any finalized figures for this data. Even when insurers post their approval or denial rates, there is no information linking these rates to specific services.
Patients "can't see whether the plan routinely approves those requests, or if it has a higher denial rate, or how long it takes for those particular requests to be approved, since everything here is an average or aggregated to a very high level," said Jeannie Fuglesten Biniek, associate director of the Program on Medicare Policy at KFF.
Fuglesten Biniek also noted that it's "quite difficult" for potential enrollees to even locate plans' prior authorization data. To find the right data for their plan, enrollees would need to know the contract their plan is part of, something that is "knowable, but it's not obvious."
Separately, AMA president Bobby Mukkamala said that the burden of prior authorization on physicians continues to be high even with these improvements. On average, physicians completed 39 prior authorization requests every week.
"Announced reductions in the number of services subject to prior authorization are a positive first step, but physicians and patients must experience a meaningful, real-world decrease in administrative burden and care delays," Mukkamula said.
Overall, Optum Advisory's* Jess Garber and TJ Burdine said that while there has been some good progress made on prior authorization, several challenges remain, and it's not clear whether these changes will have a significant impact on providers and patients.
"The good news: insurers are entering the arena on prior authorization reform; we are seeing reductions in requirements, faster decisions, and higher overall approval rates, most likely as a result of provider and patient pressure," Garber and Burdine said.
However, "[e]vidence suggests meaningful gaps remain," Garber and Burdine said. "Publicly reported data offers little insight into which services are being denied, or why, ultimately limiting transparency and accountability. While industry pledges and high‑profile moves (like UnitedHealthcare* cutting 30% of requirements) signal momentum, reforms are voluntary, incremental, and uneven, making [us] wonder if these measures will really reduce significant administrative burden for providers and prevent care delays for patients."
*Advisory Board is a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, the parent company of UnitedHealthcare and Optum. All Advisory Board research, expert perspectives, and recommendations remain independent.
(Pestaina, KFF, 4/2; Firth, MedPage Today, 4/3; Goldman, Axios, 4/8; Minemyer, Fierce Healthcare, 4/7; Picchi, CBS News, 5/5; Myshko, Managed Healthcare Executive, 4/24; Diaz, Becker's Health IT, 5/13; CMS press release, 5/13)
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.