Daily Briefing

4 minute read

Do fruits and vegetables increase lung cancer risk?


Experts typically recommend a diet rich in fruits and vegetables to improve health and lower cancer risk, but a new study from the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center found that diets rich in fruits and vegetables were associated with a higher risk of lung cancer, which researchers suggest could be a result of pesticides sprayed on the foods.

Study details

For the study, which was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, the researchers wanted to investigate why rates of lung cancer among nonsmokers age 50 and younger, especially women, have remained elevated.

To do this, they surveyed 187 patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer by age 50. These patients provided details on their demographics, diet, smoking history, and lung cancer diagnosis.

The majority of patients had never smoked and had a form of lung cancer that was biologically different from the type of lung cancer caused by smoking.

The researchers used the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) to rank the overall quality of each patient's diet on a scale of 1-100 in order compare their diet with the broader U.S. population. Young nonsmoking lung cancer patients had an average HEI score of 65 out of 100 compared to the national average of 57. Among the participants in the study, women had higher HEI scores than men.

On average, the researchers found that younger lung cancer patients ate more daily servings of fruit, vegetables, and whole grains than the rest of the general population. For example, participants in the study averaged 4.3 servings of dark green vegetables and legumes and 3.9 servings of whole grains per day, while the average U.S. adult eats 3.6 servings of dark green vegetables and legumes and 2.6 servings of whole grains each day.

The study also found that young women who don't smoke have a higher incidence of lung cancer than men, and that women also typically had a diet higher in produce and whole grains than men.

 

 

"This work represents a critical step toward identifying modifiable environmental factors that may contribute to lung cancer in young adults."

The researchers speculated that the increased lung cancer rates among people who had diets richer in fruits and vegetables could be a result of the pesticides used to keep crops pest-free. Commercially produced, nonorganic fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are more likely to be associated with a higher pesticide residue than dairy, meat, and many processed foods, according to Jorge Nieva, a medical oncologist and lung cancer specialist at USC Norris and lead author of the study. Nieva also noted that agricultural workers exposed to pesticides typically have higher rates of lung cancer.

The researchers in the study didn't test specific foods for pesticides but instead used published data on average pesticide levels for food categories like fruits, vegetables, and grains to estimate exposure.

Discussion

According to Nieva, the link between pesticides and lung cancer in young people, especially in women, needs more research. The next step would be to confirm the link directly by measuring pesticide levels in blood or urine samples from patients, which could help reveal whether some pesticides increase lung cancer risk more than others.

"This work represents a critical step toward identifying modifiable environmental factors that may contribute to lung cancer in young adults," Nieva said. "Our hope is that these insights can guide both public health recommendations and future investigation into lung cancer prevention."

Nieva acknowledged the study had some limitations — primarily that it relied on survey data and was limited by the participants' memories of their diets.

"Also, the survey participants were self-selected, and this could have biased the findings," he said.

Marc Siegel, a clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Medical Center and senior medical analyst at Fox News, said the study is "interesting" but added that it "raises far more questions than it answers."

"It is possible that the increased lung cancer risk could be due to pesticide exposure in whole farmed foods, but it is by no means certain," he added. "How much exposure is needed? How much of it gets into food and in which areas? This requires much further study."

Peter Shields, emeritus professor of medical oncology at Ohio State University, noted that being lean, which a person who has a diet heavy in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains could be, is known to correlate with lung cancer. "The authors may not be seeing anything more than this," he said.

"And, even more important, a role for pesticides is entirely speculative," he added, concluding that "the well-known benefits for eating fruits and vegetables … far outweigh any speculation of data interpretation from this study."

George Chaux, a board-certified interventional pulmonologist and medical director of interventional pulmonology at Providence Saint John's Health Center, noted that pesticides are "known to be carcinogens" and that they're associated with lung cancer at heavy exposure rates, like in agriculture workers.

"This is why washing your fruits and vegetables before eating raw foods is very important," he said. "I would not conclude from this data nor recommend that people stay away from a healthy diet of fruits and vegetables, which has been conclusively shown to improve overall health, including risk of colon cancer and heart disease. I would also not necessarily recommend organic foods, which tend to be more expensive; the best approach is to wash your fruits and vegetables well before you eat them."

(Keck Medicine of USC press release, 4/17; Blake, Newsweek, 4/20; Rudy, Fox News, 4/21; Mole, Ars Technica, 4/20; Pratt, Healthline, 4/21)


SPONSORED BY

INTENDED AUDIENCE

AFTER YOU READ THIS

AUTHORS

TOPICS

INDUSTRY SECTORS

Don't miss out on the latest Advisory Board insights

Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.

Want access without creating an account?

   

You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.

1 free members-only resources remaining

1 free members-only resources remaining

You've reached your limit of free insights

Become a member to access all of Advisory Board's resources, events, and experts

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.

Benefits include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

You've reached your limit of free insights

Become a member to access all of Advisory Board's resources, events, and experts

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.

Benefits include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece

Email ask@advisory.com to learn more

Click on ‘Become a Member’ to learn about the benefits of a Full-Access partnership with Advisory Board

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you. 

Benefits Include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

This is for members only. Learn more.

Click on ‘Become a Member’ to learn about the benefits of a Full-Access partnership with Advisory Board

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you. 

Benefits Include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox
AB
Thank you! Your updates have been made successfully.
Oh no! There was a problem with your request.
Error in form submission. Please try again.