Auto logout in seconds.
Continue LogoutThe Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program adjusts hospital inpatient Medicare payments based off performance on a set list of patient safety measures and hospital-associated infections. It is one of three mandatory pay-for-performance (P4P) programs that the Affordable Care Act introduced and is managed by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The program aims to improve patient safety and reduce common, but avoidable, conditions that patients can contract during hospital stays by measuring a hospital’s performance on seven metrics and adjusting payment based on the hospital’s scores compared to the national average. The quartile of hospitals with the worst performance receives a 1% penalty on their inpatient Medicare revenue.
The HAC Reduction Program, in tandem with other P4P programs (the Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) and Hospital Readmissions Reduction Programs), incentivizes hospitals to deliver higher quality care. Over time, the program has included more conditions, raising the stakes for hospital performance. Moreover, while hospitals’ financial adjustment is based on historical performance, CMS also evaluates them relative to their peers, so improvement on HAC measures one year does not exempt hospitals from a penalty the next year.
Reducing infection prevalence makes good business sense for hospitals, as HACs often lead to increased length of stay, mortality rates, and total costs. On top of those drivers, most conditions included in the HAC program are also included within the VBP program, doubling providers’ incentive to manage infection rates.
The HAC Reduction Program evaluates two categories of hospital safety metrics:
CMS calculates providers HAC scores by aggregating hospital performance on each metric, and comparing that to the national average. Hospitals that score in the bottom 25% when compared to the national average receive a 1% penalty on their inpatient Medicare revenue. Prior to 2020, CMS weighted PSI-90 at 15% of a hospital’s final score, while the remaining infections were combined and weighted at 85% of the final HAC score. CMS has since terminated that system, and now equally weights each HAC metric at 16.7%.
Clinical
As Americans age and the prevalence of chronic diseases increases, providers have to manage a population that’s more prone to complications and adverse events. Thus, it is important for clinical staff to develop and ensure compliance with hospital protocols aimed at limiting infections. For example, physicians and nurses may monitor excessive catheterization and focus on appropriate catheter insertion and removal to decrease risk of infection. Additionally, clinical staff must remain up-to-date on regulations related to the HAC Reduction Program, as CMS can change the number and type of safety measures they evaluate.
Financial
Hospital-acquired infections, which affect five to ten percent of patients each year, result in $45 billion of additional health care costs. In addition, the emergence of an older and sicker population has led to a growing prevalence of HACs. Through the HAC Reduction Program, CMS holds hospitals accountable for the mounting cost of these preventable infections. Within the program, the worst quartile of HAC performers are subject to a 1% penalty on their inpatient Medicare reimbursement. Since the program was rolled out, more than one third of hospitals have been penalized at least once. In addition, because some HAC Reduction Program measures overlap with the VBP Program, providers that fail to maintain low infection rates may be penalized within both programs.
Operational
To succeed under the HAC Reduction Program, providers must ensure accurate, detailed, and timely clinical documentation. Hospital staff must ensure they properly code patients for illnesses present on admission because failure to do so could result in these noncoded complications eventually being classified as HACs. From a staffing perspective, providers may need to expand their Infection Control Personnel (ICP) to help combat HACs. Inadequate ICP staffing is a considerable issue for hospitals as ICPs are responsible for a number of crucial tasks ranging from staff education about antibiotic resistance to infection metric reporting. Emphasis on sterilizing “high risk, high touch” objects (e.g., phones, keyboards, and reusable tools) is also paramount. Finally, providers must ensure all environmental service providers, whether employed by the hospital or a third party, are included in hygiene education efforts and understand their role in boosting patient safety.
While HACs are a longstanding issue, many hospitals are now looking for more inventive strategies to improve patient safety.
Innovative technologies will be in high demand.
Enhanced training and care standardization will be critical.
Providers will focus on promoting hygienic practices throughout their organization.
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.