Auto logout in seconds.
Continue LogoutCancer diagnoses among Americans under 50 have surged in recent decades, yet mortality rates have remained relatively stable, leading some experts to question whether the U.S. is over-detecting cancers that may never become life-threatening, and whether immediate treatment is always necessary, Gina Kolata reports for the New York Times.
Since 1992, the number of diagnoses of eight cancers in U.S. patients under 50 has doubled, including cancers in the thyroid, anus, kidney, small intestine, colorectum, endometrium, and pancreas.
"The magnitude and speed at which early onset cancer incidence has increased is unlike most cancer trends ever observed (the possible exception being cigarette smoking and lung cancer)," the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) said.
Many experts are debating the cause of the spike in cancer rates, examining environmental toxins, the obesity epidemic, and changes in peoples' microbiomes, potentially from diets heavy in ultra-processed foods, Kolata reports.
Some cancer specialists have countered those concerns saying the surge in cancer diagnoses is a result of detecting cancers that didn't need to be detected — or at least didn't need to be detected so soon — as they wouldn't have killed patients had they never been found or if they'd been found later in life.
Not every cancer is dangerous — some disappear on their own while others stop growing or pose no risk to the patient, Kolata reports.
Autopsy studies have found many people die with small cancers they never knew about. One review of these studies in prostate cancer found the cancer can appear in men as young as their 20s. The older the men were, the more likely they were to have undetected prostate cancer, and by their 70s, around a third of white men and half of Black men had undetected prostate cancer.
Similarly, a study of thyroid cancer in Finland found that at least a third of adults had undetected tumors. Less than 1% of people who have thyroid cancer die from it.
However, it's impossible to know if a person's cancer will be deadly or not, and if the cancer is gone after treatment, there's no way to know if the treatment was actually necessary.
But according to H. Gilbert Welch of Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard Medical School, there's a way to know at a population level if an increase in diagnoses is either a false alarm or a signal of something dangerous. If more lethal cancers are being found, then death rates should be rising, but if death rates remain steady while cancer rates rise, many of those patients didn't need to receive diagnoses, Welch said.
That happened in South Korea with thyroid cancer, as rates of the cancer skyrocketed with the introduction of widespread ultrasound screening, but death rates didn't. It was estimated that 90% of the cancers detected and treated in women didn't need to be found.
Welch, alongside Vishal Patel from Harvard and Adewole Adamson from Dell Medical School, found something similar, reporting in a recent paper looking at trends over the past 30 years that the current spike in cancer diagnoses in younger people in the eight previously mentioned cancers was not tied to an increase in deaths.
"While more testing is often seen as the solution to an epidemic, it can just as easily be the cause."
For all but two of the eight cancers whose rates have risen in younger people, death rates are flat or declining. Death rates from colorectal cancer are up 0.5% a year while their incidence is increasing by 2% a year, and endometrial cancer death rates have risen around 2% per year, as have their incidence rates.
Elena Ratner, a gynecological cancer specialist at Yale University, attributed much of the increase in endometrial cancer to the obesity epidemic.
In an editorial accompanying Welch's paper, Cary Gross from Yale said the increase in cancer diagnoses could reflect an increase in testing, as well as better quality tests that are finding cancer unintentionally while looking for other conditions. These cancers, with the exception of colorectal cancer, are not part of routine cancer screenings, but scans and routine blood tests are finding cancers by chance.
In addition, CT, ultrasound, and MRI scans are increasingly sensitive and used more frequently, Gross said. "We are a very imaging-happy society."
Welch and his colleagues had similar conclusions in their paper. "The epidemic narrative not only exaggerates the problem, but it may also exacerbate it. While more testing is often seen as the solution to an epidemic, it can just as easily be the cause," they wrote.
While cancer treatments can save lives, Welch and his colleagues said that treatments need to be balanced with the consequences of discovering a cancer that didn't need to be found.
Unnecessary cancer treatments can cause infertility and organ damage in some patients, and the cost of the treatments — as well as surveillance, follow-up care, and management of adverse side effects — can be so expensive, that "[t]he financial strain can be devastating," Welch and colleagues wrote.
Welch said the number of unnecessary diagnoses could go down if doctors did less routine testing and if they held back from pursuing every abnormality found in asymptomatic patients.
"Abnormality is a normal part of life," Welch said.
However, other experts say the surge in cancer diagnoses is a warning, and given rates are rising so quickly, there's a compelling reason to discover why.
Oncology benchmarks: Key insights from Advisory Board surveys
"Something very interesting is going on here," said Timothy Rebbeck, an epidemiologist and geneticist at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. And, he added, "it's not good."
According to Julie Gralow, CMO at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the surge in cancer rates is of grave concern. "I'm saying it's real and it's serious," she said. "And we need to understand why."
Kimmie Ng, a colorectal cancer specialist at Dana-Farber, said she's seeing more younger patients with colorectal cancer. Many of those patients had symptoms and their cancers weren't just found by chance, she said.
Ng added that investigators are studying patients' microbiomes and their environments for clues.
Gralow noted that one reason there hasn't been an increase in cancer deaths is because better treatments are saving lives.
"We absolutely have had major advances in treating many cancers," she said.
Whether a cancer should be treated early on could depend on its type. Some cancers, like prostate and thyroid, tend to be indolent, meaning patients with early-stage cancer could simply wait and see if their cancer progresses.
That was a lesson learned by prostate cancer specialists after a three-fold surge in cases occurred between 1987 and 1992 after doctors started offering men a blood test to detect the cancers. Many of those men treated the cancer aggressively with surgery or radiation, but the increased detection didn't lead to an increased death rate, and many prostate cancer experts eventually agreed there wasn't an epidemic of prostate cancer but rather an epidemic of detection.
Now, prostate cancer specialists are more likely to advise men with a low-risk diagnosis, which accounts for over half of recent prostate cancer cases, to forgo treatment and have regular monitoring to see if their tumors grow.
Jamie Rigal was 31 when a blood test determined he had prostate cancer. Rigal said he consulted with doctors at some of the best cancer centers in the country, and at one of them, he was told he needed aggressive therapy or he would die of prostate cancer.
But Rigal's doctor, Leonard Marks, a prostate specialist at the University of California, Los Angeles, urged Rigal to forgo treatment and regularly monitor his cancer to see if it was progressing.
Marks found cancer twice on biopsies after Rigal's initial test and then never saw it again. Rigal's blood test results became normal and have remained normal, as have his biopsies. It's been 20 years since Rigal's diagnosis, and two recent MRIs didn't detect any cancer.
Rigal said now he goes in every two years for testing and otherwise tries to put cancer out of his mind.
"I kind of take a mental health approach," he said. "I take it year by year."
(Kolata, New York Times, 12/8)
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.