Case Study

How to Evolve Your Quality Reporting Governance

20 Minute Read


    The challenge

    Many hospitals and health systems have a siloed approach to CMS quality reporting governance due to the constant evolution of reporting requirements. In addition, internal factors like multiple electronic health records (EHRs) and staff turnover make it challenging to coordinate quality reporting efforts across the Quality Payment Program (QPP), Promoting Interoperability (PI) program, and Alternative Payment Models (APM). We profiled four organizations that have made significant progress in addressing this challenge.

    The organizations

    • Intermountain Healthcare is a 24-hospital health system based in Idaho, Nevada, and Utah. They participate in an MSSP1 Track 1+ ACO2 and have one EHR.
    • Mass General Brigham is a 10-hospital health system in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. They participate in an MSSP Enhanced ACO and have one EHR.
    • West Willow Hospital (a pseudonym) is a 5-hospital health system based in the Southeastern United States. They have 2 inpatient EHRs and 18 outpatient EHRs.
    • Community Hospital Corporation (CHC) owns, manages, and consults with over 120 hospitals to guide, support, and enhance the mission of community hospitals and providers. Their hospitals operate on five EHRs.

    The approach

    All four organizations have evolved their governance structures over time to adapt to changing CMS requirements and take advantage of alignment between program requirements.

    The result

    Breaking down silos between QPP and PI program management enables the health systems to coordinate efficiently between departments, make decisions quickly, and reduce redundant efforts.

      Not a member? You can still download a preview of this resource. Download now

    Log in to access this content

    Log in

    Don't have an account? Learn about membership benefits


    1. CHC Hospitals, CHC Consulting, and CHC ContinueCARE provide the resources and experience community hospitals need to improve quality outcomes, patient satisfaction, and financial performance. For more information on CHC, please visit :

    2. Includes clinical quality, risk management, financial management, and legal.

    Cookies help us improve your website experience. By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.