Many hospitals and health systems have a siloed approach to CMS quality reportinggovernance due to the constant evolution of reporting requirements. In addition,internal factors like multiple electronic health records (EHRs) and staff turnover makeit challenging to coordinate quality reporting efforts across the Quality PaymentProgram (QPP), Promoting Interoperability (PI) program, and Alternative PaymentModels (APM). We profiled four organizations that have made significant progress inaddressing this challenge.
All four organizations have evolved their governance structures over time to adaptto changing CMS requirements and take advantage of alignment between programrequirements.
Breaking down silos between QPP and PI program management enables the healthsystems to coordinate efficiently between departments, make decisions quickly, andreduce redundant efforts.
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.