Auto logout in seconds.
Continue LogoutRecent CMS rules, both proposed and finalized, have introduced changes that could significantly impact orthopedic care, including payment cuts to orthopedic services and a new mandatory joint replacement model.
In July, CMS released its proposed rule for the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for calendar year (CY) 2027.
For CY 2027, the agency proposed a payment update of -1.19% for clinicians in advanced payment models and -1.68% for all other clinicians. With a temporary 2.5% payment increase included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act expiring at the end of the year and only modest payment updates to offset, physician payment rates will fall next year.
However, physicians providing orthopedic care could see more significant payment cuts due to other measures in the proposed rule.
According to CMS, changes to the MPFS' relative value units (RVU) would reduce aggregate allowed charges for orthopedic surgery by 7%, with a 5% reduction for orthopedic services in non-facility settings and an 8% reduction in facility settings.
CMS has also proposed substantial work-RVU reductions for several high-volume orthopedic procedures, including hip, knee, and shoulder surgeries. OrthoForum, an organization that represents independent orthopedic practices, warned that these changes could reduce physician reimbursement for total hip and knee replacement procedures by 20% in 2027.
Other proposed changes that could negatively impact orthopedic care include cuts to reimbursement for surgeries performed on the same day as evaluation and management visits and stricter requirements for the billing of remote patient monitoring services.
"This is not just a payment issue. It is a patient care issue," said Joel Mayerson, chair of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' advocacy council. "The Proposed Rule undervalues the work required to diagnose, treat and manage complex musculoskeletal conditions, resulting in fewer physician options, longer wait times, and delayed access to care for Medicare beneficiaries. Clinical judgment must drive care decisions, not administrative policy that fails to account for what patients and surgeons face in the exam room and operating room."
In late July, CMS finalized the Inpatient Prospective Payment System and Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment system rule for fiscal year (FY) 2027.
As part of the rule, CMS finalized a new mandatory joint replacement model called the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Expanded (CJR-X) model. According to CMS, the initial CJR model, which ran from 2016 to 2024 in around 320 hospitals, generated around $112.7 million in net Medicare savings between 2021 and 2023.
"Clinical judgment must drive care decisions, not administrative policy that fails to account for what patients and surgeons face in the exam room and operating room."
The new model CJR-X is the first mandatory, nationwide test of episode-based payment and will begin Jan. 1, 2028 — a slight delay from its original start date of Oct. 1, 2027. Under the model, hospitals are accountable for spending on the episode of care encompassing initial joint replacement surgery, the stay at the hospital, and the first 90 days of recovery, including follow-up care like physical therapy. Major hip and knee joint replacement surgeries, as well as ankle replacement surgery, are included in CJR-X.
However, hospital groups, including the American Hospital Association (AHA) and the Federation of American Hospitals, have pushed back on the model.
"[W]e are disappointed CMS failed to make meaningful improvements to its expanded joint replacement bundled payment program," said Joanna Hiatt Kim, VP of payment policy at AHA. the American Hospital Association. "Mandatory models present significant challenges, and CMS' low-volume threshold fails to ensure that hospitals have enough cases to integrate changes in care delivery and actually determine if they had an impact."
In addition, health experts say that CJR-X could accelerate the shift to ambulatory surgery centers for joint replacement procedures instead of inpatient or hospital outpatient settings. Under CJR-X, only inpatient and hospital outpatient procedures are included.
"This will also undoubtedly increase the outmigration of joint replacement to ambulatory surgery centers, which may be appropriate, but there will be increasing burden on the inpatient side to care for higher-acuity patients," said Sean Bak, an orthopedic surgeon at Motor City Orthopedics.
Antonia Chen, president of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons and chair of orthopedic surgery at UT Southwestern Medical Center, said CJR-X, as well as proposed payment cuts for orthopedic services in the 2027 MPFS, will likely shift financial pressure toward surgeons while facility-side savings will accrue toward hospitals.
"The hard part is they're cutting just the surgeon fee, but the hospital is getting the benefit for the bundle payments," Chen said, noting that the mismatch could push some surgeons to limit Medicare patients, leave Medicare altogether, or increase their daily case volume to offset the payment cut.
"This is a choice that we're now being forced on, because it's not economically sustainable to sustain a private practice," said P. Maxwell Courtney, division chief of adult reconstruction at Rothman Orthopaedics. "None of us actually want to opt out of Medicare. We still want to care for Medicare patients."
Expert insight | One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Understanding the healthcare impacts
TEAM is a mandatory bundled payment model that focuses on five high-cost procedural episodes: hip and femur fractures, major bowel procedures, coronary artery bypass grafts, spinal fusion, and lower extremity joint replacements. The model, which went into effect Jan. 1, 2026, uses risk-adjusted benchmarks to evaluate total Medicare spending across a 30-day episode of care.
Hospitals that are participating in TEAM are excluded from participating in CJR-X. However, after TEAM ends, participants will automatically enroll in CJR-X on Jan. 1, 2031. Because CJR-X uses many of the same underlying mechanics as TEAM, hospitals can use the same strategies to prepare for both models.
In this expert insight, Optum Advisory's* Erik Johnson, Jennifer Leazzo, and Jennifer Puzziferro outline five ways hospitals can move beyond compliance with TEAM and turn it into a strategic advantage for long-term success:
According to Johnson, health systems that treat TEAM as "something they have to do rather than something that can learn and build upon" risk falling behind their peers. Instead of viewing TEAM and CJR-X as a regulatory checklist, health systems should use these payment models as a catalyst for broader system transformation, which will position them to better manage bundled payments and handle greater risk going forward.
*Advisory Board is a subsidiary of Optum. All Advisory Board research, expert perspectives, and recommendations remain independent.
(Eydis, Becker's Spine Review, 7/17; OrthoForum press release, 7/16; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 7/22; Pean, Techy Surgeon, 7/14; Muoio, Fierce Healthcare, 7/31; CMS press release, 7/31; Pean, Techy Surgeon, 8/3; Newitt, Becker's ASC Review, 8/24; Eydis, Becker's Spine Review, 8/27)
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.