Daily Briefing

5 minute read

Why nurses lag behind doctors on AI


According to a new report from Elsevier, many nurses are supportive of AI tools, but their use of the technology lags significantly behind physicians due to a lack of training, limited nursing-specific tools, and more barriers. 

How do nurses feel about AI?

For the report, Elsevier surveyed 2,757 clinicians, including 692 nurses and 2,065 physicians, from 118 countries about their work and AI usage between December 2025 and February 2026.

When it comes to their work, 61% of nurses said they are seeing more patients than the year before, and 71% say they have enough time to provide good care — higher than the 60% of physicians who said the same. However, nurses who said they didn't have enough time highlighted high patient volumes (71%), excessive administration (64%), lack of support staff (56%), and increasing complexity of patients' medical needs (56%) as the primary challenges.

Nurses also reported feelings of burnout. Around a third of nurses said they experienced tiredness or exhaustion that impaired their ability to treat patients effectively. Over 40% of nurses also said keeping up with medical advances or new technologies is challenging.

Many nurses are supportive of AI, but their usage and trust of the technology is still lacking. Eighty percent of nurses said AI wouldn't replace clinicians but would become a critical assistant in the next five to 10 years. Similarly, 78% of nurses said AI skills will be essential to clinician training, and 61% expect clinicians using AI to provide better care than those who don't use the technology.

However, only 41% of nurses report using AI at work — much lower than the 57% of physicians who reported the same. Among nurses who use AI, most use generalized AI tools for professional education (42%), patient education (40%), and querying medical literation (34%). Only 30% of nurses frequently use a clinical-specific AI tool, compared to 37% of physicians.

 

"Health systems will see greater impact when they co-develop solutions with nurses, embed tools directly into nursing workflows, and invest in role-specific education rather than generic training."

According to Elsevier, there is a lack of clinical-specific tools for nurses compared to those for physicians. In a scoping review published in BMC Nursing, researchers found that the development of clinical decision-support tools designed for nursing "remains in its infancy."

Nurses also spend more time with patients than physicians, which gives them less time to use AI or be trained on how to use it. In the report, less than half of nurses (46%) said their institution was good at providing AI training while just over half (51%) said the same about access and governance.

Many nurses also say that they are often not included in decision-making about technology at their organization. Over 40% of nurses said their views are rarely or never adequately represented in their organization's decision-making processes. In comparison, only 19% of physicians said their views are rarely or never represented.

There also continues to be significant distrust around AI tools. Only 42% of nurses say that AI tools are trustworthy. Nurses are also less likely than physicians to believe that AI will save them time in the next two to three years, or that AI will routinely analyze medical images.

To increase trust in AI solutions, nurses said that the tools need to be easy to use (65%), comprehensive across multiple sources (62%), transparent with citations (61%), safe and unlikely to cause harm (60%), and created using peer-reviewed data (60%). 

Commentary

According to Fanta Cherif, a research consultant at Advisory Board, "[t]he gap in AI adoption between nurses and physicians is less a reflection of interest and more a signal of structural misalignment."

"Introducing AI without tailored training, workflow integration, and nursing-specific design inevitably limits uptake," Cherif said. "What's striking is that trust and (not willingness, which is the common perception) is the binding constraint. When fewer than half of nurses perceive AI tools as trustworthy, it underscores the need for transparency, validation, and governance models that include frontline nursing perspectives from the outset."

"From an AI implementation standpoint, this is a design and inclusion problem, not a user problem," Cherif added. "Health systems will see greater impact when they co-develop solutions with nurses, embed tools directly into nursing workflows, and invest in role-specific education rather than generic training. Nurses are signaling a clear openness to AI as an assistive technology (particularly for documentation and patient education) but adoption will only scale if tools reduce burden, align with clinical realities, and are introduced with adequate support."

Amy Hall, dean of the School of Nursing at Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University, also highlighted the need to include nurses in decisions around AI and its implementation.

"Nurses need a stronger voice in which tools are adopted to support patients and how they are implemented," Hall said. "When nurses aren't included in AI decisions, it's harder to integrate these technologies into everyday practice in ways that truly support patients and workflows."

"If technology is introduced that positively impacts nurses' workflow and patients' outcomes, nurses are likely to adopt it," said Monica Westhead, a managing director at Advisory Board. "However current AI applications don't fit seamlessly into a nurse's responsibilities and can require significant changes in the way nurses practice."

For example, Westhead noted that nurses are not taught in school to dictate all care being delivered, something that is essential for AI-based ambient listening documentation. Most AI tools are also developed for physicians, and some may be adapted from physician workflows, which are not always compatible with nursing workflows.

"Nursing workflows — and the experience of working as a nurse — differs significantly from physicians," Westhead said. "It is incumbent on AI market leaders to co-develop solutions with nurses and nurse leaders that serve the goals of healthcare provider organizations, specifically supporting nurses."

Similarly, Ali Knight, an RN and research consultant at Advisory Board, said that "[a] successful tech implementation — one that solves the identified challenge — needs to work for the care team and no one understands nurses' needs better than nurses."

"The product itself needs to be intuitive and make patient care more reliable, easier, or faster," Knight added.

"At a time when healthcare systems are under increasing pressure, clinicians see clear potential for AI to improve patient care and efficiency," said Jan Herzhoff, president of Elsevier Health. "However, realizing that potential requires more than access — it demands trusted, evidence-based tools, proper training, and inclusive implementation that supports all members of the care team."

(Walker, Nurse.org, 5/13; Goldman, Axios, 5/12; Elsevier Clinician of the Future 2026, Nurses Edition report, accessed 6/8; Elsevier press release, 5/12)


SPONSORED BY

INTENDED AUDIENCE

AFTER YOU READ THIS

AUTHORS

TOPICS

INDUSTRY SECTORS

RELATED RESOURCES

Don't miss out on the latest Advisory Board insights

Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.

Want access without creating an account?

   

You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.

1 free members-only resources remaining

1 free members-only resources remaining

You've reached your limit of free insights

Become a member to access all of Advisory Board's resources, events, and experts

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.

Benefits include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

You've reached your limit of free insights

Become a member to access all of Advisory Board's resources, events, and experts

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.

Benefits include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece

Email ask@advisory.com to learn more

Click on ‘Become a Member’ to learn about the benefits of a Full-Access partnership with Advisory Board

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you. 

Benefits Include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

This is for members only. Learn more.

Click on ‘Become a Member’ to learn about the benefits of a Full-Access partnership with Advisory Board

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you. 

Benefits Include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox
AB
Thank you! Your updates have been made successfully.
Oh no! There was a problem with your request.
Error in form submission. Please try again.