Daily Briefing

There's a test to predict heart attack risk. Why aren't more people using it?


A coronary artery calcium scan is a simple test that can accurately estimate a person's risk of heart disease and heart attack and helps doctors determine if medications are needed. However, health experts say that the test is "still being underused compared to its value."

How a simple test can predict your risk of heart attacks

When doctors calculate a risk score for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, they incorporate several factors, including age, cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes. These risk scores can help determine if a patient requires medication to control any symptoms and reduce their risk of a heart attack, but they may not be as helpful for all patients, especially if their score lands in an in-between range.

"A risk score is derived from a large population, with mathematical modeling," said Michael Blaha, codirector of the preventive cardiology program at Johns Hopkins University. "We can say that this score describes the risk of heart disease among thousands of people. But there are lots of limitations in applying them to one individual."

For certain patients, a coronary artery calcium (CAC) test can provide a more accurate estimate of their risk of atherosclerotic heart disease. A CAC test is a special type of CT scan that measures the amount of calcium in the walls of the arteries. Calcium makes up a small part of plaque buildup in the heart, and it is easy to see on a scan compared to cholesterol.

Although guidelines vary, cardiologists typically recommend statins to patients who have calcium scores over zero and will suggest higher intensity statins if scores exceed 100. Patients who have a calcium score of over 300 may need even more aggressive treatment since their risk is similar to people who have already had heart attacks.

In a 2024 study from Intermountain Health, researchers found that CAC scores were accurate predictors of risk for future heart attack, as well as mortality. In addition, patients who had a zero CAC score had three times lower risk of heart attack, as well as all-cause death. 

"The coronary artery calcium score appears to be an excellent and accurate indicator of health and overall prognosis, even beyond heart disease," said Jeffrey Anderson, a distinguished research physician at Intermountain Health and the study's principal investigator.

The CAC test "leads to more statin prescriptions, better adherence to statins, less progression of atherosclerosis and less plaque growth" 

Separately, a recent study from Australia found that asymptomatic patients with a family history of coronary artery disease who had received a CAC test had a sustained reduction in cholesterol and a significantly lower risk of heart disease after three years compared to people who had not been tested.

The CAC test "leads to more statin prescriptions, better adherence to statins, less progression of atherosclerosis and less plaque growth," said Philip Greenland, a preventive cardiologist at Northwestern University. "It tips the scale."

Why aren't more people using CAC tests?

Although the number of CAC scans used quadrupled between 2006 and 2017 and online searches for related terms have increased significantly in recent years, Blaha said that "it's still being underused compared to its value."

One reason that patients may not be getting the test is that it is rarely covered by insurance, including Medicare. Although CAC tests are relatively inexpensive compared to other tests, patients must cover the cost, which is around $100 to $300 out of pocket.

 

Some patients may also be reluctant to start taking statins, which they will need to be on for the rest of their lives. According to a 2019 survey of almost 5,700 adults who had been recommended statin therapy, a quarter were not taking any kind of statin. Of this group, 10% declined a statin, and 30% started a stain before discontinuing it, largely due to concerns about side effects.

However, researchers say that the fear of side effects with statins is exaggerated, with studies showing that reports of muscle pain, which is the most common complaint when using statins, were comparable in both patients who received statins and those who received placebos.

"The actual risk is much, much lower than the perceived risk," said Alexander Zheutlin, a cardiology fellow and researcher at Northwestern University. Cardiologists can also reduce doses or switch patients to different medications to reduce or avoid any painful side effects.

In general, many cardiologists see CAC tests as a persuasive tool to help patients get treatment to reduce their risk of heart attacks. According to Zheutlin, if calcium scores are more influential than traditional risk assessments alone, more patients might agree to take statins.

Stephen Patrick, a 70-year-old retired tech executive from San Francisco, was one of the people who changed their mind about taking statins after undergoing a CAC test.

"For years, I was borderline on cholesterol, and I managed to beat it back with less cheese toast" and lots of exercise, Patrick said. "I was on no meds, and I took pride in that." However, after both his total and LDL cholesterol were higher than recommended, his doctor recommended a CAC test, which returned a score of 176.

Now, Patrick takes atorvastatin, or Lipitor, daily, and his cholesterol levels have decreased significantly. "I might have tried [a statin] anyway," he said. "But the calcium score meant I had to pay more attention."

(Span, New York Times, 7/27; Corliss, Harvard Heart Letter, 11/1/24; Intermountain Health, 11/18/24)


SPONSORED BY

INTENDED AUDIENCE

AFTER YOU READ THIS

AUTHORS

TOPICS

INDUSTRY SECTORS

Don't miss out on the latest Advisory Board insights

Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.

Want access without creating an account?

   

You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.

1 free members-only resources remaining

1 free members-only resources remaining

You've reached your limit of free insights

Become a member to access all of Advisory Board's resources, events, and experts

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.

Benefits include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

You've reached your limit of free insights

Become a member to access all of Advisory Board's resources, events, and experts

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.

Benefits include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece

Email ask@advisory.com to learn more

Click on ‘Become a Member’ to learn about the benefits of a Full-Access partnership with Advisory Board

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you. 

Benefits Include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox

This is for members only. Learn more.

Click on ‘Become a Member’ to learn about the benefits of a Full-Access partnership with Advisory Board

Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you. 

Benefits Include:

Unlimited access to research and resources
Member-only access to events and trainings
Expert-led consultation and facilitation
The latest content delivered to your inbox
AB
Thank you! Your updates have been made successfully.
Oh no! There was a problem with your request.
Error in form submission. Please try again.