CMS's physician supervision requirements continue to be an area of uncertainty and confusion for many of our members. Here, we have compiled the most up-to-date information on physician supervision for chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
CMS defines three levels of physician supervision for hospital outpatient departments:
General supervision: The physician or advanced practitioner (AP) must be available by telephone to provide assistance and direction if needed.
Direct supervision: The physician or AP providing supervision must be "immediately available" and "interruptible" to provide assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure; however, he or she does not need to be present in the room when the procedure is performed.
Personal supervision: The physician or AP must be in attendance in the room during the procedure.
All therapeutic services are subject to CMS's supervision requirements. Under these requirements, both chemotherapy and radiation therapy require direct supervision in both the hospital outpatient and freestanding settings.
CMS states that a physician or AP, such as a nurse practitioner (NP) or physician assistant (PA), must provide direct supervision of therapeutic services. The person providing supervision must be permitted to do so under state law, scope of practice regulations, and their hospital-granted privileges. In addition, he or she must have sufficient knowledge and training to be able "to furnish assistance and direction, not merely manage an emergency."
Get the oncology leader's Advanced Practitioner Toolkit
While CMS does not specify that radiation therapy services should be supervised by a radiation oncologist, it is the opinion of the American College of Radiology (ACR) that a board-certified/board-eligible radiation oncologist is the clinically appropriate physician to supervise these procedures.
CMS's supervision requirements set a higher bar for physician offices and freestanding centers than for hospital outpatient departments for radiation therapy. Whereas CMS allows APs to provide supervision for radiation therapy in hospital outpatient departments, a physician is required to supervise these services in the freestanding setting. This is not the case, however, for chemotherapy supervision in the freestanding setting, which can be performed by either a physician or an AP. Click here to read more about the regulation differences.
With very few exceptions, diagnostic X-ray and other diagnostic tests payable under the physician fee schedule must be furnished under at least a general level of physician supervision and some require direct or personal supervision. The exact type of supervision required depends on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) or Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCs) code and can be found here. CMS maintains that the supervision for diagnostic tests in either the freestanding or hospital outpatient setting must be administered by a physician, not an AP.
In the CY 2018 HOPPS final rule, CMS has finalized a proposal to reinstate non-enforcement of direct supervision for outpatient therapeutic services for CAHs and small rural hospitals having 100 or fewer beds for CY 2018 and 2019. In other words, if your program qualifies as a CAH or a small rural hospital, there are no formally outlined supervision requirements for 2018 and 2019.
In the 2016 MPFS final rule, CMS offered some critical clarifications around its supervision requirements. In the past, there's been confusion about who should be billing for "incident to" services when the physician providing supervision is not the physician who ordered the service. As shown in the graphic below, CMS included new language that states that the supervising provider must also be the billing provider for "incident to" services.
It is also important to note that CMS requires all "incident to" services performed by auxiliary personnel to be done under direct supervision of a physician. Additionally, because "incident to" services must be performed in a non-institutional setting to non-institutional patients, hospitals, off-campus sites owned by hospitals, and provider-based facilities must limit these services to discrete and separately identifiable parts of the facility.
As mandated in the 2012 and 2013 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System Final Rule, the Hospital Outpatient Payment Panel (HOP Panel) will evaluate the supervision requirements for each therapeutic outpatient code. In August, 2012, the HOP Panel made a number of recommendations to CMS to adjust physician supervision requirements for specific services, including many cancer-related services. This committee recommended that several services can safely be provided with general supervision, instead of direct supervision.
Although CMS declined to adopt all of the Panel's recommendations, it did announce a reduction in the minimum required level of supervision for a number of services, including injection/infusion, intravenous, and central venous access services.
During our 2015 Infusion Center Benchmarking Survey, we asked our members how their institutions deal with physician supervision. As shown in the table below, the most common team member providing supervision for infusions is medical oncologists, and many institutions also use APs to provide supervision.
In our 2016 Radiation Therapy Benchmarking Survey, we asked our members how their institutions deal with physician supervision in their radiation therapy facilities. As shown in the table below, more than 90% of respondents use only radiation oncologists.
Cancer programs must balance their operational and financial realities with the desire to provide patients with the latest and greatest treatments and technologies. Find out how to ensure your investments have a significant impact on your patients and maximize your financial return.
Download NowCreate your free account to access 2 resources each month, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 2 free members-only resources remaining this month remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining this month
1 free members-only resources remaining this month
You've reached your limit of free monthly insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free monthly insights