Auto logout in seconds.
Continue LogoutThe United States is the only industrialized nation where maternal mortality and morbidity rates are increasing. All U.S. demographic groups experience an elevated risk of adverse outcomes, but Black and Native American patients experience devastating rates of complications. Clinical leaders can advance equitable outcomes by embedding best practice obstetrics protocols into frontline practice, tracking performance and identifying care gaps, and tapping into system- and community-based resources.
Most hospitals and health systems have made significant investments in maternal health. Those investments often include creating point-of-delivery care standards and emergency protocols for labor and delivery. This focus on labor and delivery—while mission-critical—solves only part of the challenge. In fact, 64% of pregnancy-related deaths occur during pregnancy and between one week and one year postpartum, also known as the “fourth trimester.” That is because inadequate access to prenatal and postpartum care leaves many patients at increased risk for clinical escalation and long-term complications.
Additionally, conventional efforts to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality operate mostly “colorblind,” without investments designed specifically to support the most at-risk racial groups. Similarly, quality reporting regulations do not require health care organizations to track or publish maternal health outcomes by race.
To adequately improve outcomes, clinical leaders must understand the root causes of health disparities and take appropriate actions at the system level.
Maternal health interventions are incomplete without addressing racial health disparities. That is because the U.S. maternal health crisis is, at its core, a crisis of inequity. Although all demographics are impacted by the poor performance of the U.S. in maternal health compared with other industrialized nations, women of color are disproportionately impacted. The pregnancy-related mortality rate for Black patients in the US is 3.3x the rate for white patients. For Native American patients, it’s 2.5x the rate. These trends are similar for morbidity rates. To improve outcomes, health care organizations must examine the root causes of inequities: the intersection of structural racism and sexism.
Root causes of maternal health disparities
1. Enduring legacies of institutional racism hardwired into policy, social institutions, and culture
2. Deprioritization of women's holistic health care across the life span, particularly in favor of fetal outcomes
Without an in-depth understanding of how these root causes manifest, interventions aren’t likely to make a significant or sustained impact.
The legacies of these structural underpinnings impact women of color across four levels: systemic, institutional, interpersonal, and individual.
These multifaceted and interconnected inequities are deeply embedded within the U.S. health care system. That’s why true change is so challenging. Hospitals cannot solve structural racism and sexism on their own, but they do have a role to play in reducing maternal health inequities.
Clinical executives are uniquely positioned to champion maternal health equity investments at their organization. While investments should focus on addressing the needs of the most at-risk populations—Black and Native American patients—these changes will improve health outcomes for all maternal patients.
There are three immediate steps that hospitals and health systems can take to improve maternal health equity. First, all organizations should make best practice obstetrics protocols easy for frontline staff to implement. Then, organizations should institute ongoing feedback mechanisms to monitor adherence to care standards and assess gaps in maternal care. With that intel in hand, champions should tap into resources outside their traditional purview to expand their impact.
All organizations should ensure their obstetrics patients receive the highest quality, evidence-based care throughout their delivery. To do this, organizations must ensure that staff are aware of best practices and can easily follow them.
Adopting evidence-based care standards
Organizations must start with adopting best practice safety protocols if they haven’t already. The Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) has developed open-access, data-driven maternal safety bundles for hospitals and health systems to adopt, including bundles on:
To review these protocols, visit the Council on Patient Safety in Women’s Health Care here.
Facilitating frontline implementation
After reviewing evidence-based safety protocols, leaders must ensure clinicians are able to easily and consistently incorporate them into workflows. To do so, engage a multidisciplinary group of leaders, including physician, nursing, and administration, to design and roll out care standards system-wide.
Maternal health champions should:
It can be deeply unsettling for frontline care teams to hear that their practice could lead to unnecessary maternal death—or worse, that is already has. It’s likely that you’ll face pushback rooted in these difficult emotions, as well as general resistance to logistical change. To overcome these barriers, approach conversations with care teams, departments, and facilities as equal partnerships and identify the structural—not individual—challenges to ensuring patient safety.
For more guidance on designing easy-to-implement care standards, review our Create Care Standards Your Front Line Will Embrace research report.
Once organizations have no-regrets safety protocols in place, maternal health champions should institute ongoing feedback mechanisms to monitor adherence to care standards and identify other gaps in maternal care. Champions should:
Expand existing maternal mortality review boards into multidisciplinary perinatal review committees
The first step is to launch a multidisciplinary perinatal review committee to unearth the root causes of clinical escalation. Many organizations already have maternal mortality review boards, but these should be expanded beyond instances of mortality during delivery to include all complications before, during, and after birth. This expanded charter emphasizes that it’s important to prevent “near misses” as well as mortality, since morbidities can lead to long-term health complications and emotional trauma. Reviewing all unexpected complications, no matter the outcome, also ensures that successful responses to these complications are a matter of planned processes, not luck.
Committees should be made up of a truly multidisciplinary group, including a range of clinical and administrative leaders as well as patients and community members. A wide perspective allows the committee to use a broad definition of morbidities. It should include clinical complications, downstream mental health impacts, and subjective measures including whether patients felt respected and were owners in the medical decision-making.
Use race-stratified data and community input to identify and address care gaps
Multidisciplinary perinatal reviews surface critical gaps in care delivery after a serious complication has occurred. In addition to these reactive improvements, leaders should task data analysts and community health staff with collecting quantitative and qualitative data to proactively identify blind spots and next steps.
Common metrics to track, stratified by race, include:
Three tips for designing an effective data-gathering strategy
With this intel in hand, clinical leaders should make targeted investments by tapping into resources outside their traditional purview: across the system and in the community. Design solutions in partnership with the most impacted groups to advance equity. Prioritize partnerships that achieve the following:
The root causes of the U.S. maternal health equity crisis are complex and overwhelming, and the changes needed to reverse current trends will not be easy. But this is not the job of a clinical leader—or hospital, for that matter—alone. Success requires multidisciplinary, community-based action.
However, action shouldn’t be restricted to hospital/community partnerships. The most effective way to address the root causes of inequities is through government policy change. Hospitals and health systems already have policy advocacy efforts traditionally targeted at reimbursement rates, as well as the clout and scale to be effective. Leaders should direct resources to support government proposals designed to improve maternal access to care, quality outcomes, and workplace equity. Major proposals include:
To support hospital initiatives, Advisory Board will continue to identify tactical examples hospitals and health systems can implement to improve performance and advance equitable outcomes. For more on this public health crisis, review our Snapshot of Maternal Health Inequity cheat sheet.
Create your free account to access 1 resource, including the latest research and webinars.
You have 1 free members-only resource remaining this month.
1 free members-only resources remaining
1 free members-only resources remaining
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
You've reached your limit of free insights
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This content is available through your Curated Research partnership with Advisory Board. Click on ‘view this resource’ to read the full piece
Email ask@advisory.com to learn more
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.
This is for members only. Learn more.
Never miss out on the latest innovative health care content tailored to you.