The Reading Room

Our latest update on all things imaging

Filtered by: Physician Issues Hide

In case you missed it: Why patient price sensitivity is really an access issue

by Sarah Hostetter June 1, 2015

Our colleague, Rivka Friedman, recently wrote about her experience at an urgent care center, which led her to the realization that price and access issues in health care are really one in the same.

Medical groups and radiology practices alike are used to thinking about access in terms of proximity and appointment availability, but affordability is increasingly a barrier for patients trying to access care.

Read more »

Preparing for CDS: Help physicians make better decisions

by Solomon Banjo March 30, 2015

The Daily Briefing recently covered a Medscape Medical News article discussing the challenge of differentiating between "careful" and "defensive" medicine. This challenge is most acutely felt in the ED where doctors often don’t have relationships with patients and therefore lack the clinical information necessary for optimal care.

According to the U.S. Congress of Technology Assessment, "defensive medicine" is defined as physicians ordering tests, procedures, or visits, or avoiding high-risk patients or procedures "primarily (but not necessarily solely) to reduce their exposure to malpractice liability.” Unsurprisingly, defensive medicine is expensive and has contributed significantly to the rise in health care spending—but experts say it’s hard to draw a line between being appropriately cautious and overly aggressive.

Read more »

In case you missed it: New evidence of head CT scan overuse in the ED

Michael Koppenheffer March 9, 2015

The nation’s emergency rooms have not been consistently “choosing wisely” when it comes to CT scans of the head, according to the Physician Executive Council's latest analysis of Crimson data.

For several common conditions that lead patients to visit the emergency room—headache, syncope (fainting), or minor head trauma—more than four out of five head CT scans performed in 2013 didn’t meet specialty society recommendations for appropriate use. In other words, most of these scans—which are costly—were administered even though patients didn’t need them, the results didn’t inform the course of care, and each scan exposed the patient to radiation unnecessarily.

Read more »

Poll results: Should radiologists talk to patients?

by Ben Lauing January 20, 2015

In my blog post last month, I discussed the pros and cons of having radiologists consult directly with patients. I also posed a question: do yours?

77 people responded to my quick poll, from a wide array of institutions. Keep reading to find out what they said.

Read more »

Why you should think twice about the Medicare Imaging Demonstration

by Erin Lane January 13, 2015

Recently there has been a lot of buzz about the effectiveness of using clinical decision support (CDS) to promote appropriate ordering of advanced imaging exams—especially since RAND released the results of the Medicare Imaging Demonstration (MID) late last year. The demonstration was a CDS pilot program designed by CMS—and the results weren’t encouraging.

But we need to understand more about the study before we jump to conclusions based on what’s been the news. Significant flaws in the design and limitations in methodology impact how we should interpret these results.

Read more »

Who orders the most imaging?

by Erin Lane December 22, 2014

A recent study published in JAMA Internal Medicine by the ACR’s Neiman Health Policy Institute examines the diagnostic imaging ordering patterns of primary care physicians and non-physician primary care providers, such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants (sometimes referred to as advanced practitioners or APs).

Examining a sample of Medicare claims from 2010-2011, the authors found that APs ordered imaging for 2.8% episodes of care compared to physicians’ 1.9%, controlling for geographic variation and patient demographics. With the well-known concern about a shortage of primary care physicians across the country, many health systems are turning to APs to expand patient access. It is worth noting that this data is a few years old, and with recent increased attention on appropriate utilization this gap may have narrowed since 2011. Regardless, discrepancy in ordering patterns brings up some legitimate questions about patient safety and cost of care.

Read more »

Should radiologists talk to patients?

by Ben Lauing December 4, 2014

Last week, I came across an article in The New York Times, in which author Gina Kolata adds another voice to the ongoing conversation about whether or not radiologists should be directly consulting patients.

While opinions on this question run the spectrum, experts seem to agree that, at the very least, radiologists need to become more accessible.

What do you think: Should patient consultations be part of radiologists' accessibility strategy?

Read more »

Virtual second opinion website appeals to patient preferences

by Solomon Banjo November 14, 2014

In the final rule released in October 2014, CMS decided against reimbursement for secondary interpretations of images, but despite this development, some have been using the second opinion concept to appeal to patient preferences.

Read more »

  • Manage your events
  • View your saved items
  • Manage your subscriptions
  • Update personal information
  • Invite a colleague