Reputation matters to patients. But a reputation for what? Read more.

 

Cardiovascular Rounds

News, resources, and analysis from the Cardiovascular Roundtable

Filtered by: Service Lines Hide

Ready to 'FoCUS'? We explain the new guidance for focused cardiac ultrasound

by Julie Bass August 22, 2014

The World Interactive Network Focused on Critical UltraSound (WINFOCUS) recently released the first international evidence-based guidance on the use of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS)—a form of echocardiography primarily used in critical care settings. Creation of these guidelines was important to standardize situations in which FoCUS is acceptable, as well as detail who is qualified to utilize the tool.

It took a multidisciplinary team of 33 experts from 16 countries several years to complete, but the collaboration yielded 108 statements and recommendations.

Read more »

We’re experts on our patients’ hearts, but do we understand their heads?

by Olivia Ley August 20, 2014

Regulatory emphasis on quality and cost transparency is increasing, insurance networks are narrowing, and patients are selecting their care providers more actively. As a result, CV programs are searching for ways to better understand their patients’ priorities in order to effectively design patient access strategies and generate the kind of patient experience that leads to brand loyalty. 

So, what do your patients want, and what sources do they trust when evaluating their options?

Read more »

Overcome barriers to CV shared decision making

by Andrew Hresko August 14, 2014

A growing body of evidence suggests that educating patients about available treatment options and including their preferences in medical decisions has the potential to reduce utilization, lower costs, and improve patient experience.

One recent study reported that this practice of patient-provider collaboration, known as shared decision-making, can reduce use of major invasive heart surgery by 20% and lower per-member-per-month costs 9% compared to standard care. Shared decision making is especially relevant to cardiovascular care because the specialty treats so many conditions for which one treatment option does not have clear clinical benefit over alternatives.

Given the many potential benefits of shared decision making, it’s important to make sure you’re implementing strategies that have proven successful. In last week’s issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, researchers from the Mayo Clinic, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, and UCLA published a review of techniques for implementing shared decision making.

Read more »

Sizing up the AF ablation market: Q&A with Brian Contos

by Jeff Rakover July 29, 2014

Amid recent reports of declining procedural volumes and inpatient admissions for CV services, some services are poised for growth.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) programs, like structural heart and valve programs, present an opportunity for increased revenue and market capture. As we describe in our Blueprint for Atrial Fibrillation Centers, the prevalence of AF in the U.S. is expected to increase more than five-fold by 2050. Unsurprisingly, we get a lot of questions from members interested in market trends and clinical updates in this area, especially for AF ablation.

We recently sat down with the Cardiovascular Roundtable’s executive director, Brian Contos, to understand current dynamics in the AF ablation market, including volumes, cost, and reimbursement trends.

Read more »

What can you learn from FY 2013 TAVR data?

Brian Contos , Megan Tooley July 24, 2014

It’s safe to say it’s been a busy summer for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In the past few months, we’ve seen a number of significant updates related to the procedure, including:

  • CMS proposed new TAVR-specific MS-DRGs in its FY 2015 Inpatient Proposed Rule, which would likely lead to an overall bump in reimbursement for the procedure if approved in August
  • Indications for Medtronic’s CoreValve device were expanded to include TAVR in high-risk patients in June, following initial approval of the device in Jan. 2014 for extreme-risk (i.e., inoperable) patients
  • Edwards Lifesciences’ next-generation Sapien XT device was approved for use in high-risk and inoperable patients just days later

So it seemed a fitting time to provide an update to the benchmarks we shared last year on TAVR cases performed across the United States. We analyzed TAVR claims from the latest Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) data set, which includes all Medicare cases performed in Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 (from Oct. 1, 2012–Sept. 31, 2013).

Read on for the latest benchmarks on TAVR volumes, patient characteristics, efficiency, and reimbursement, and to get a sense for how these changed in the first two years following FDA approval.

Read more »

Want a better picture of performance? Financial integration offers a panoramic shot.

May 27, 2014

Olivia Ley, Cardiovascular Roundtable

While financial integration requires an investment of time and resources, many programs are beginning to realize the substantial value of having a more holistic and transparent view of their performance. Some programs are integrating across specialties, while others are integrating across different sites of care beyond the hospital setting.

We’ve included examples of both below and shared how these programs are already starting to benefit from the results.

Read more »

Pick the right risk stratification tools for your CV program

May 5, 2014

Andrew Hresko, Cardiovascular Roundtable

In our study Blueprint for Cardiovascular Care Management, we stress the importance of using risk stratification to pair patients with appropriate clinical and non-clinical providers and to determine the intensity and frequency of follow-up care. This targeted approach will not only help optimize clinical care, but also enable more efficient use of limited resources.

While risk stratification is a powerful strategy, the reality is that no existing tool is perfect. There are many classes of tools that assess different nuanced aspects of patients’ well-being and ideal care plans, and within each of those classes there is a multitude of tools that rely on slightly different metrics. The best risk stratification strategies often involve some combination of available models.

To help you begin to weed through your options and select the best suite of risk stratification tools for your CV care management program, I’ve provided a list of links to some of the most commonly used, publicly available care management risk stratification tools.

Read more »

The case for palliative care

May 1, 2014

Olivia Ley, Cardiovascular Roundtable

CV programs are starting to embrace palliative care as a means to improve quality and reduce costs—and they’re backed by some compelling evidence.

We've reviewed some of this research below, and offered guidance to help you integrate these services into your care continuum strategy.

Read more »

Comment Now

You must be logged in to comment

What Your Peers Are Saying

Rating: | Brian Maher | March 30, 2012

  • Manage your events
  • View your saved items
  • Manage your subscriptions
  • Update personal information
  • Invite a colleague